Friday, August 27, 2021

Review: Becoming a Writer, Staying a Writer: The Artistry, Joy, and Career of Storytelling

Becoming a Writer, Staying a Writer: The Artistry, Joy, and Career of Storytelling Becoming a Writer, Staying a Writer: The Artistry, Joy, and Career of Storytelling by J. Michael Straczynski
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

One of the worst things about advice is that it's not always practical. This seems to be especially true the more subjective the opinion on a subject is. Example: you're about to leave the house and you check the forecast. It tells you it's raining outside. You look out the window and, sure enough, water is indeed falling from the sky. Here's the thing. Being told it's raining outside isn't the practical advice. It's only the information used to establish said advice. The practical advice would be to grab an umbrella or a raincoat. That seems a little obvious given the subject, but I'm merely using it as a framework for something more complex.

Not only is most advice about art (writing in this case) is subjective. It's also rarely practical. I once had a potential agent say my cover letter needed to be more vibrant. The thing is, that doesn't actually mean anything. She was telling me it was raining outside without any regard to using an umbrella. I tend to see this a little too often. Either the person giving advice doesn't know what they're talking about, or they're attempting to sandblast writing so it all sounds the same.

Is Straczynski, and his new book on writing, guilty of this? No. But I'm laying this out to explain how I approach writing advice. I don't just use a grain of salt, I unscrew the top and use the whole fucking shaker.

Before I render my judgment on if the book is any good, I also need to layout who this book is for. Unlike most works, this is more of a textbook. You might be faced with the greatest book on algebra ever written, but if you don't have a class or a job involving algebra, it's pretty much useless to you. Breaking down the audience into two groups.

The first group is fans of JMS's work who wish insight into his writing process. It carries many personal stories of his career and his perspective into the industry he's worked in for decades. The level of sharpness of this aspect really did catch my eye and I think anyone who loves his work will get something worthwhile here. So, if you're reading this review wearing a Babylon 5 T-shirt, go ahead and read this book.

The second group needs a little more justification. And that's people who are looking to becoming paid writers. I said 'paid' because you're either already a writer or you're not. Also, as a disclaimer, if you're the type who uses the label of a writer and haven't actually written anything down, this book isn't for you. In particular, there's a section of the book that calls out posers. So save yourself the heartache and avoid this book. And me.

To the point made at the beginning, this book does offer up some helpful advice. If you're looking to crack into the business and/or looking to improve your craft, you should be able to find something here that applies to you. One piece of advice though: grab a highlighter. You're going to want to mark the relevant bits.

See, that's how practical advice works.

Since I can't resist saying something negative, I'll put it down here towards the end. There are a few sections in the book that are less helpful than others. There's an entire chapter towards not shoving your ideas in writers' faces. Good advice, but the chapter could have been a lot shorter and seemed a little too personal. I know many artists face this problem. There's even a Chappelle Show skit about that very problem. So, while I understand the frustration, I doubt most of those people are going to be reading this book. Or read period.

Regardless if you're in groups A or B (or maybe both, who knows?), I'd recommend this book. The use of real world examples can get a little straining, but JMS needs to establish himself so you don't think he's talking out of his ass. Trust me. He's mostly not.

View all my reviews

Friday, August 20, 2021

Review: The Ruthless Lady's Guide to Wizardry

The Ruthless Lady's Guide to Wizardry The Ruthless Lady's Guide to Wizardry by C.M. Waggoner
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

This book was obviously written by an introvert. Not that is a knock against it. In fact, if someone offered me a choice between a book written by an introvert or an extrovert, I'd choose introvert every damn time. I merely point this out because it just stood out to me more here than it usually does. There are long excerpts of internalization and description. This is both a plus and minus, but I'll get into more in a bit. If a book deep with introversion sounds like a turnoff, stop reading this review now and write this book off ad something you're not interested in.

I'll also say this book is fun. It's intelligently written, clever, and even has a few sprinkles of genius throughout.  It's super strength strong in the prose and character department. Everything is concise and explained without making it feel you're being talked to. It's just a hands down a well-written book. Bottom line: If reading the synopsis makes you think this book is your cup of tea then it probably is.

Unfortunately, there are two major drawbacks I observed.

One, the actual plot of the book felt like it spends most of its time on the back burner. The pacing is cooked through well enough, but the increased introversion allowed the story to feel unimportant. As if the interaction between the characters is more or less the real draw and purpose of the book. The relationships are just given far more time and care, feeling like the plot is just the reason everyone is together having a good time. The characters and their time together is great, but I just wished for the plot to have a more equal measure.

Two, I honestly felt that this book's author could have written a better book. There's a real talent on display here, but the type of book it is feels a little beneath her station. If that makes any damn sense. It just feels she wrote a book that she thought would be popular (and it should be), rather than writing something that is truly inspired. Or maybe I'm just full of myself. That could easily be the case.

If you made it this far into the review, I just want to make it clear I'm recommending this book. Plot issues aside, it's still a wonderful read. I don't normally like to use the word 'fun' because it can give the impression the book is lesser than what it is. But, that's the word I keep coming back to. Fun. I'm honestly looking forward to what this author has in store for us next.

View all my reviews

Thursday, August 5, 2021

Review: Batman/The Maxx: Arkham Dreams

Batman/The Maxx: Arkham Dreams Batman/The Maxx: Arkham Dreams by Sam Kieth
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Comic books shouldn't be art forward. There, I said it. Without compelling writing, the art serves more like a gallery than as a form of media. To be fair, comics shouldn't be writing forward either. The writing not being much if you don't have the art to direct it. Everything needs to work together in order to make a great graphic novel.

My point? This Maxx/Batman crossover has a great deal of awesome art, but little in way of a convincing story. The wording is surprisingly dense while not really saying that much. The structure is all over the damn place. Ranging from repetitive to confusing. And I would even say it's unintentionally funny.  An example on the last point, when Batman meets Maxx, he describes him as a homeless person. While I'm not sure if the ludicrous nature of it was on purpose, I couldn't help but chuckle at the idea this huge purple monster with a severe overbite was supposed to be mistaken as a regular homeless person. Greatest detective my ass.

The art is great though. While the flow in the paneling could use a great deal of work, how the characters are drawn and framed are damn near perfect. I'd probably prefer a book without wording and just the art. If there's one thing I'd have to judge against it, is that the amount of work and detail seem to hinder on the distance. The further the character(s) are away, the less amount of detail goes into the page. There is a slight, but noticeable, change from up close of a characters' face that looks degraded if the page shows the same character from the waist up. Then if you get far enough away that the characters are in the distance, they look only slightly better than stick figures. I don't mean to take away from the insane talent on display, but I also couldn't help but mention it.

I'll admit that I wasn't familiar with the Maxx character before diving into this book. But I don't think knowing more would have helped my opinion. Characterization and plot dynamics aren't the huge problems here. Especially when you consider how the book goes out of its way to explain everything to you. The whole writing side of things just feels clunky. I was glad I was exposed to such great art but reading it felt like driving over grassy hills in a 2WD sedan.

View all my reviews